Search for: All records

Theory suggests the possibility for significant deviations between total pressure (or dynamic pressure) and lithostatic pressure during crustal metamorphism. If such deviations exist, the implications for orogenic reconstruction would be profound. Whether such non-lithostatic pressure conditions during crustal metamorphism are recorded and preserved in the rock record remains unresolved, as direct field evidence for this phenomenon is limited. Here, we investigate the Paleogene Tethyan Himalaya fold-thrust belt in Himachal Pradesh, northwestern India, which is the structurally highest part of the Himalayan orogen and deforms a ~10–15 km thick Neoproterozoic–Cretaceous passive margin stratigraphic section. Field-based kinematic studies demonstrate relatively moderate shortening strain across the Tethyan Himalaya. However, basal Tethyan strata consistently yield elevated pressure-temperature-time (P-T-t) estimates of 7–8 kbar and ~650°C, indicative of deep burial during Himalayan orogeny (ca. 20–45 Ma, 25–30 km depths). These P-T-t conditions can be reconciled by: (1) deep Cenozoic burial along cryptic structures and/or significant flattening of the Tethyan strata; (2) basal Tethyan strata recording metamorphism and deformation related to pre-Himalayan tectonism; or (3) non-lithostatic pressure conditions (i.e., tectonic overpressure). To test these models, we systematically mapped the Tethyan fold-thrust belt along the Pin Valley transect in northwestern India, a classic site for stratigraphic, paleontological, paleoenvironmental, and structural reconstructions. The Pin Valley region provides an opportunity to study a structurally continuous metamorphic field gradient from the near-surface to structural depths between 10–15 km, which should reflect P conditions ≤4 kbar if lithostatic. We integrate a multi-method approach combining detailed geologic mapping with quantitative analytical techniques (e.g., thermometry, finite strain analyses, thermo/geochronology, and thermobarometry) to quantify the magnitude, kinematics, thermal architecture, and timing of regional deformation, metamorphism, and subsequent exhumation. Results show: (1) throw on shortening structures is moderate to low (≤4 km); (2) temperature-depth relationships record a continuous, but regionally elevated, upper-crustal geothermal gradient of ≥40 °C/km, which is inconsistent with deep burial models (≤25 °C/km); (3) minimal flattening of basal Tethyan strata; (4) upper Tethyan strata yield pre-Himalayan low-temperature thermochronology dates, further refuting deep Cenozoic burial; and (5) basal Tethyan P-T-t estimates confirm elevated mid-crustal conditions of ~7 kbar, 630°C at 10–15 km depths during the Cenozoic. Preliminary volume expansion calculations are minimal; therefore, mechanisms involving non-hydrostatic thermodynamics, deviatoric stresses, rock strength contrasts, and tectonic mode switching are being explored. 

The Tethyan Himalayan sequence (THS) is the structurally highest lithotectonic unit of Indian affinity within the Cenozoic Himalayan orogen. In the NW Himalaya of the Himachal Pradesh, India, the Neoproterozoic–Cretaceous THS is thought to have relatively modest deformation despite the unit commonly recording early collision-related shortening. This lack of significant deformation contrasts that of other Himachal lithotectonic units closer to the foreland. In addition, burial depths of the Himachal THS estimated from structural reconstructions (~10 km) and basal metamorphic pressures (7–8 kbar, ~28 km lithostatic burial) conflict. To address these issues, we performed geologic mapping, thermochronology, and restored new balanced cross sections along two transects across the Himachal THS to better constrain its deformation state and timing, stratigraphic thickness, and burial extent. Along the Spiti and Pin valleys, the THS is shortened by seven NE-dipping thrusts and one SW-dipping thrusts that mostly form fault-propagation folds. The Mata Nappe region (NE of Spiti Valley) has been reinterpreted as a thrust pop-up structure, consistent with structural observations. Along this transect, the estimated THS thickness measured from the basal Akpa granite and Haimanta Group to the uppermost-exposed Tandi Group is ~12.3 km. Restoration of one cross section along this transect yields a minimum shortening of ~30 km (~22% strain). Farther SE along Sutlej Valley, the THS is cut by three SW-dipping thrusts and several S-dipping normal faults. The estimated thickness of the exposed Akpa granite and Haimanta Group is ~8.5 km. Restoration of one cross section along this transect yields a minimum shortening of ~8 km (~21% strain). Thrusts mapped along both transects are interpreted to branch from a single decollement formed by the South Tibet detachment and Great Counter thrust. Our THS shortening estimates added to those for other Indian rocks in the Himachal Himalaya (Webb, 2013) yields a total minimum estimate of ~515–537 km. Preliminary zircon (U-Th)/He dates along Spiti and Pin valleys generally young towards the SW from ca. 42–5 Ma. These results confirm: (1) relatively minor shortening of the Himachal THS that was likely compensated by duplexing of other units; and (2) the discrepancy between THS burial estimates, which may be a product of non-lithostatic pressure. 

Theory suggests the possibility for significant deviations between the total pressure (or dynamic pressure) and lithostatic pressure throughout Earth’s crust. Whether such non-lithostatic pressure conditions are recorded and preserved in the rock record remains unresolved, as direct field confirmation is limited, yet the implications for orogenic reconstruction are profound. Here we investigate the Paleogene Tethyan Himalaya fold-thrust belt in Himachal Pradesh, NW India, which is the structurally highest part of the Himalayan orogen and deforms a ~10–15 km thick Neoproterozoic–Cretaceous passive margin stratigraphic section. Field-based kinematic studies demonstrate relatively moderate shortening strain estimates across the Tethyan Himalaya, yet basal Tethyan strata consistently yield elevated pressure-temperature-time (P-T-t) estimates of 7–8 kbar and ~650°C, indicative of deep burial during Himalayan orogeny (25–30 km depths). These P-T-t conditions can be reconciled by: (1) deep Cenozoic burial along cryptic structures and/or significant flattening of the Tethyan strata; (2) basal Tethyan strata recording pre-Himalayan deformation related to Pan-African orogeny; or (3) non-lithostatic pressure conditions (i.e., tectonic overpressure). To test these models, we systematically mapped the Tethyan fold-thrust belt along the Bhaba Pass-Pin Valley transect in NW India, a classic site for stratigraphic, paleontological, paleoenvironmental, and structural reconstructions. We integrate a multi-method approach combining detailed geologic mapping with quantitative analytical techniques (e.g., finite strain analyses, thermometry, thermobarometry, thermochronology, and geochronology) to quantify the magnitude, kinematics, thermal architecture, and timing of regional deformation, metamorphism, and subsequent exhumation of the Tethyan fold-thrust belt. Our preliminary observations refute deep Cenozoic burial of the Tethyan Himalaya, suggesting either the preservation of non-lithostatic pressures in the rock record or relicts of pre-Himalayan metamorphism. Either scenario demonstrates that caution is required in using Himalayan P-T-t estimates to reconstruct the Cenozoic Himalayan orogeny. 

Tectonic models for the development of the Himalaya, Earth's largest active collisional mountain belt, have been developed and tested through pressure, temperature, and time (P-T-t) information collected from exposed metamorphic rocks. Inferred deep burial and subsequent exhumation of these rocks are usually justified by observable structures (e.g., Main Central thrust) and mapping relationships. However, regions where pressure estimates are at odds with field-based reconstructions are reconciled with hypothesized cryptic structures that have since been completely eroded. Such field versus thermobarometric discrepancies significantly impact interpretations on the geometry, magnitude, and distribution of deformation. Here, we conducted detailed field mapping of the Paleogene Tethyan fold-thrust belt in the Himachal Himalaya, NW India, which is the structurally highest part of the Himalayan orogen and deforms a ~10–15 km thick Neoproterozoic–Cretaceous passive margin section. In this region, P-T estimates yield 6–8 kbar and ~650°C, which suggests burial to depths of ~25–30 km. To assess the viability of this deep burial, we constructed a 1:200,000 scale geologic map of the Bhaba Pass-Pin Valley region. Geologic mapping was focused on the stratigraphy, structural configuration, and metamorphic isograds of the basal Tethyan strata. Detailed field mapping aided the construction of balanced cross sections, which guided subsequent multi-method analytical approaches that fit into a coherent structural framework. Our field observations and map relationships show no major structures, abrupt changes in metamorphic grade or composition that would suggest deep burial of the stratigraphically continuous basal Tethyan group. Balanced cross sections throughout the study area suggest moderate amounts of shortening strain (~30–36%). This contribution highlights the importance of detailed field mapping to interpret P-T estimates. Ongoing analytical methods are being conducted to constrain the thermal architecture and metamorphic history of the Tethyan fold-thrust belt. 

Abstract Acritarch biostratigraphic and δ 13 C chemostratigraphic data from the Krol A Formation in the Solan area (Lesser Himalaya, northern India) are integrated to aid inter-basinal correlation of early–middle Ediacaran strata. We identified a prominent negative δ 13 C excursion (likely equivalent to EN2 in the lower Doushantuo Formation in the Yangtze Gorges area of South China), over a dozen species of acanthomorphs (including two new species— Cavaspina tiwariae Xiao n. sp., Dictyotidium grazhdankinii Xiao n. sp.), and numerous other microfossils from an interval in the Krol A Formation. Most microfossil taxa from the Krol A and the underlying Infra-Krol formations are also present in the Doushantuo Formation. Infra-Krol acanthomorphs support a correlation with the earliest Doushantuo biozone: the Appendisphaera grandis - Weissiella grandistella - Tianzhushania spinosa Assemblage Zone. Krol A microfossils indicate a correlation with the second or (more likely, when δ 13 C data are considered) the third biozone in the lower Doushantuo Formation (i.e., the Tanarium tuberosum - Schizofusa zangwenlongii or Tanarium conoideum - Cavaspina basiconica Assemblage Zone). The association of acanthomorphs with EN2 in the Krol Formation fills a critical gap in South China where chert nodules, and thus acanthomorphs, are rare in the EN2 interval. Like many other Ediacaran acanthomorphs assemblages, Krol A and Doushantuo acanthomorphs are distributed in low paleolatitudes, and they may represent a distinct paleobiogeographic province in east Gondwana. The Indian data affirm the stratigraphic significance of acanthomorphs and δ 13 C, clarify key issues of lower Ediacaran bio- and chemostratigraphic correlation, and strengthen the basis for the study of Ediacaran eukaryote evolution and paleobiogeography. UUID: http://zoobank.org/5289fdb2-0e49-4b3b-880f-f5b21acab371 .